Auditors, lawyers, tax consultants and management consultants: Four perspectives. One solution. Worldwide. Find out …
Our clients entrust us with their most important legal matters. Learn more about our legal services!
Tax laws are complex and dynamic. We face the challenge of tax law together with you - find out more.
US tariffs: Short term optimization – medium-term preparation
Germany’s Coalition Agreement and Tax Law – A Document to Fiscal Pragmatism
Capmont takes over DFH Deutsche Fertighaus Holding AG with Baker Tilly
BAG overturns forfeiture clause for share options after termination
Traditional Braunschweig logistics company Wandt is entering debtor-in-possession management with Baker Tilly
Probationary period in a fixed-term employment contract - how long can it be?
Industry-specific knowledge is essential in order to create the best conditions for customised solutions. Find out …
Baker Tilly advises biotech startup Real Collagen GmbH investment by US investor
Energy study: Uncertainty slows down investments by industry and utilities in Germany
After ECJ ruling: Financial investors still have no direct access to medical care centers
Benefit from bundled interdisciplinary competencies, expert teams and individual solutions. Learn more!
Baker Tilly offers a wide range of individual and innovative consulting services. Find out more!
Is a clause in a supplementary pension scheme effective according to which a company disability pension requires the receipt of a statutory pension for reduced earning capacity and is only paid if the employment relationship has ended? The German Federal Labor Court (Bundesarbeitsgericht, “BAG”) ruled on this issue on October 10, 2023 (case no. 250/22).
The BAG decided: It is effective
An employer granting a company disability pension may generally make the benefit in a pension scheme containing pre-formulated contractual terms and conditions (GTC) for a large number of employees dependent on the employee receiving a statutory pension for reduced earning capacity and having legally ended the employment relationship.
Facts
An employee had received temporary disability benefits from November 2020 for a limited period until the end of August 2022. Pursuant to Section 7 (4) of the employer's supplementary pension scheme (“Section 7 (4) ZVO”), an employee who receives a pension from the statutory pension insurance due to occupational disability or incapacity for work and leaves the employer's company receives a company disability pension. On the basis of a pension approval certificate by the German Pension Insurance Association dated January 2021, the plaintiff received a pension for full reduction in earning capacity upon his application in May 2020 with effect from November 1, 2020 for a limited period until August 31, 2022. In a letter dated January 19, 2021, the employee submitted the pension approval certificate to the defendant and applied for a company disability pension to be granted from January 2021. However, he did not terminate his employment relationship until August 20, 2021, with effect from March 31 of the following year.
Accordingly, the employer paid the company disability pension pursuant to Art. 7 (4) ZVO (Supplementary Pension Ordinance) only from April 2022 and not from January 2021 as requested by the employee. The former employee did not want to accept this and filed a complaint. He argued that he was already entitled to the company disability pension from January 2021. Art. 7 (4) ZVO did not clearly require the legal termination of the employment relationship. Furthermore, the regulation was ineffective anyway as he was unreasonably forced to terminate his employment relationship in order to receive company disability pension benefits.
Decision
The courts held a different view. Both the Düsseldorf Regional Labor Court (decision of May 4, 2022 – 12 Sa 73/22) and the German Federal Labor Court (decision of October 10, 2023 – 3 AZR 250/22) denied a claim as early as January 2021. For the BAG, the interpretation of Section 7 (4) ZVO as a provision of the General Terms and Conditions showed that the ZVO requires the legal termination of the employment relationship for a claim to the company pension.
The provision, which is subject to content review (Art. 305, 305a BGB), did not unreasonably disadvantage the plaintiff. It was generally not unreasonable to make the payment of a company disability pension dependent on the granting of a statutory pension for reduced earning capacity and the termination of the employment relationship. Taking into account the mutual interests, this did not put unreasonable pressure on the employee to terminate his employment relationship.
View all news