Auditors, lawyers, tax consultants and management consultants: Four perspectives. One solution. Worldwide. Find out …
Our clients entrust us with their most important legal matters. Learn more about our legal services!
Tax laws are complex and dynamic. We face the challenge of tax law together with you - find out more.
US tariffs: Short term optimization – medium-term preparation
Germany’s Coalition Agreement and Tax Law – A Document to Fiscal Pragmatism
Capmont takes over DFH Deutsche Fertighaus Holding AG with Baker Tilly
BAG overturns forfeiture clause for share options after termination
Traditional Braunschweig logistics company Wandt is entering debtor-in-possession management with Baker Tilly
Probationary period in a fixed-term employment contract - how long can it be?
Industry-specific knowledge is essential in order to create the best conditions for customised solutions. Find out …
Baker Tilly advises biotech startup Real Collagen GmbH investment by US investor
Energy study: Uncertainty slows down investments by industry and utilities in Germany
After ECJ ruling: Financial investors still have no direct access to medical care centers
Benefit from bundled interdisciplinary competencies, expert teams and individual solutions. Learn more!
Baker Tilly offers a wide range of individual and innovative consulting services. Find out more!
When workforce requirements fluctuate, agreements to work on call can provide employers with the flexibility they need. However, in order to meet the affected employees’ need for protection, the German Law on Part-Time Work and Temporary Employment Contracts (“TzBfG”) provides for certain requirements and limits. In particular, these are intended to ensure that employees know what to expect.
If the contracting parties agree to work on call without specifying the number of the weekly working hours, a weekly working time of 20 hours has generally been deemed to have been agreed since 2019 (Art. 12 (1) sentence 3 TzBfG).
In the case now decided by the German Federal Labor Court (“BAG”), such new regulation had not been observed by the employer. Since 2009, he had employed a female employee as an on-call temporary worker in his company as required. He engaged her for varying periods of time and paid her according to the hours she actually worked. The employment contract did not contain any provisions regarding the number of weekly working hours. In the years 2017 to 2019, he engaged the employee for an average of just over 100 hours per month, i.e., more than 20 hours per week. From 2020 onwards, the employer only called up fewer hours on average than in previous years. Thereupon, the temporary employee filed a lawsuit and claimed that the employer had to pay retrospective remuneration based on the average working hours for the years 2017 to 2019. This could be concluded from a supplementary interpretation of the contract.
The BAG did not follow this view in its decision of October 18, 2022 (case no. 5 AZR 22/23). According to the BAG, a number of weekly working hours deviating from the statutory presumption can only be assumed by way of supplementary contract interpretation under two conditions:
However, the plaintiff has not provided any evidence for such an assumption. The employer’s alleged call-off behavior in an arbitrarily chosen period is not sufficient.
Conclusion
In contracts with temporary staff, the parties should always agree upon a work schedule within which the employer is entitled to call off the working time. The statutory limits must be observed. This should also be checked for existing contracts concluded before 2019. Otherwise, there is a risk to run into problems with social insurance providers, particularly in the case of employees who are classified as marginally employed. If the 20-hour rule comes into effect, it is no longer possible to account for them as marginal employment on the basis of the current minimum wage.
View all news